Publication

In its ruling, the Court emphasized that the judiciary must remain free from executive interference, affirming that the executive branch cannot control or delay the execution of lawful court judgments by imposing additional requirements. The judgment has far-reaching implications, strengthening the judiciary's autonomy and ensuring citizens can rely on the courts to hold government agencies accountable without unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles.

As a human rights activist, I strongly support this decision. It is a significant victory for justice, as it reaffirms the essential principle that no individual or institution, including the government, is above the law. The ability to enforce court judgments is crucial in protecting fundamental rights, particularly when individuals or entities seek justice against government actions or inactions that violate their rights. The court's decision reinforces the democratic values of equality before the law and access to fair remedies.

This ruling also addresses the persistent challenge of delays in enforcing court orders, particularly when the government is involved. By removing the AGF’s consent requirement, the judgment ensures citizens and organizations can more effectively pursue justice against government entities. It holds the promise of a more responsive legal system, where decisions are respected and enforced promptly, safeguarding the rights of Nigerians and promoting a fairer society.